When Free Speech Costs You Funding
Governor Abbott's threat to defund San Marcos over their immigration resolution isn't about immigration—it's about silencing communities who dare to disagree with Austin.
Governor Abbott's threat to defund San Marcos over their immigration resolution isn't about immigration—it's about silencing communities who dare to disagree with Austin.
The San Marcos City Council passed a resolution expressing their opposition to certain federal immigration policies. It's not binding law. It doesn't change how federal agents operate. It's essentially the city council saying "We disagree with this policy direction."
Governor Abbott's response? Threaten to cut state funding to the city. Not because they broke any laws. Not because they interfered with federal operations. Because they had the audacity to disagree publicly.
San Marcos passed a symbolic statement of opposition to federal policy
The resolution doesn't change any laws or interfere with federal operations
Governor threatens to pull state funding as punishment for speech
San Marcos residents face service cuts for their elected officials' vote
"I didn't serve in the Marines to come home and watch elected officials punish communities for exercising their First Amendment rights. Free speech isn't just for people who agree with the governor. It's especially important for those who don't."
This isn't about immigration policy. This is about whether local communities have the right to disagree with state government without being financially punished.
If the state can punish cities for symbolic resolutions, then local elections become meaningless. Why vote for city council if Austin can override your community's voice with threats?
San Marcos residents pay state taxes too. Why should their roads, schools, and services suffer because their city council voted for a resolution the governor doesn't like?
Other cities are watching. If San Marcos gets punished for speaking out, how many other communities will stay silent rather than risk state retaliation?
Conservatives are supposed to believe in local control and limited government. Using state power to silence local voices is the opposite of conservative values.
This is what happens when politicians get so comfortable in power that they forget they work for us, not the other way around. Governor Abbott seems to think disagreement is disloyalty.
But here's what he's missing: strong communities need strong voices. Texas is better when Amarillo can disagree with Austin, when San Marcos can challenge El Paso, when local communities can chart their own course within the bounds of law.
Protect the right of local communities to express their values
State funding decisions based on need, not political loyalty
Respect the right of communities to govern themselves
Encourage healthy disagreement instead of punishing it
A strong governor doesn't silence dissent—they engage with it. They lead through persuasion, not threats.
If you disagree with a local community's position, make your case. Explain why they're wrong. Use your bully pulpit to persuade, not your budget authority to punish.
The First Amendment protects unpopular speech, not just popular speech. A governor who truly respects the Constitution doesn't try to silence communities through financial pressure.
Continue reading about the issues that matter to Texas families
The federal pause on legal services for unaccompanied migrant children is cruel and short-sighted. Texas must step up to protect vulnerable kids.
Read More →President Trump's "Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy" order isn't about merit—it's about rolling back decades of progress.
Read More →End gerrymandering and implement ranked choice voting for real democracy that works for all Texans.
Learn More →